Resources

Beyond helping clients realize quality and accuracy with quick and precision testing, Engineers at SACL have been actively involved in Research and Development to uncover insights, discover innovative methods and processes to execute testing and quality control with excellence.

Read through some of the academic resources co-authored by our engineers 

Performance evaluation of standard grouted anchors versus expanded anchors

Foundations and tiebacks with expanded elements have been used in the past, namely soil anchors, driven, vibrated and bored piles. This paper presents a test program conducted at a site in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, comparing the performance of conventional tiebacks (strand anchor with gravity grouting) to shorter tiebacks with an expanded anchor. The conventional tiebacks (strand anchors) were 150 mm in diameter and were constructed to a depth of 28 m:18.0 m of unbonded length and 10 m bonded in dense sands with gravity grout. Tiebacks anchored with expanded elements were installed in a 228 mm diameter hole to a depth of 7 m and were expanded in loose to compact sands. The expanded element was initially 1.2 m long and about 0.95 m long after expansion. The remainder of the tieback was unbonded. The results of the tension tests conducted on both types of tiebacks showed that the tiebacks with expanded elements provided on average about three times the resistance measured for conventional anchors, even in less competent soils.

Effects of freeze-thaw cycles on earth pressure acting on shoring system

A case history is presented in this paper examining two 18-m deep sheet pile cofferdams supported by four levels of wale bracing with corner struts. The performance of the shoring system during construction was continuously monitored for a period of one year using vibrating-wire strain gages at critical locations where maximum compressive stresses are expected. The monitoring data presented in this paper reflects a period of frequent temperature fluctuation cycles. The strain data shows that the stress in corner struts builds up a net increase with each freeze-thaw cycle. The measured stresses retreated to their original estimated values after the complete spring thaw which helps to isolate the frost effect on the shoring supports. The paper addresses the freeze-thaw effects and suggests practical considerations for designing safe shoring systems in such harsh unpredictable climate.

Correlation between concrete properties and sonic wavespeed using non-destructive field testing procedures

The correlation between the sonic wave speed in concrete and its compressive strength is one that has caught the interest of many geotechnical professionals dealing with Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) of concrete foundations. The present paper reports the findings from a study carried out by AATech Scientific Inc. (ASI) Engineers. Multiple miniature concrete columns are built with different mixes varying the content of aggregates, sand, and cement materials, along with several molded cylinders of each batch. The compressive strength of the samples was determined following ASTM C39/C39M-17 and sonic wave speed was determined using low strain Pile Integrity Testing (PIT). Similar work has been published by others, however, the present study targets the effects of concrete mix proportions and age. The NDT testing method used in the present study is an industry standard Quality Control (QC) testing method used in the field, as opposed to laboratory ultrasonic testing.

Bidirectional pile testing: what to expect

Bidirectional (BD) testing of foundation piles was first introduced by Pedro Elísio (Brazil) in 1981 and Jorj Osterberg (USA) in 1987. It is still, however, not fully embraced by the industry despite its substantial technical and economic advantage over the conventional head-down test. This article provides a brief description of the state-of-the-art in bidirectional testing of foundation piles, advantages, difficulties, and recommendations. Case histories from the authors’ experience illustrate some issues that can be encountered in BD testing. One issue being the effect of uneven shaft resistance distribution on strain gage. Also discussed is the location of strain gages, and whether strain-gage instrumentation is warranted in short piles. This is intended to raise awareness and confidence in specifying bidirectional testing as an effective tool for optimizing a piled foundation design. The authors recognize the importance of sharing experience in a field where trial and error can come at high cost and better planning can lead to more rewarding tests.

Additional Resources including
The Red Book, Basics of Foundation Design

-by Bengt Fellenius

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, Pulse Echo Testing (PIT) can be used to verify anomalies detected by Crosshole Sonic Logging (CSL) testing. While CSL provides a detailed assessment of the integrity of drilled shafts and other deep foundations by evaluating the sound wave travel times between pairs of access tubes, PIT offers a complementary method by sending a stress wave down the length of the shaft and analyzing the reflected signals. This can help confirm the presence, location, and extent of anomalies such as voids, inclusions, or cracks identified during CSL testing, providing a more comprehensive evaluation of the foundation’s condition. It is important to note, however, that anomalies at the pile toe are difficult to detect using PIT as they can be masked by the toe reflection.

Yes, dynamic testing using the Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) can be used to test cast in place or continuous flight auger concrete piles (CFA). PDA testing measures the response of a pile to a dynamic load, providing information on pile capacity, integrity, and soil resistance distribution. This requires the PDA Engineer to be highly experienced in setting up and conducting such tests and in selecting and modeling a proper hammer to prevent inducing excessive tensile stresses that can damage the pile.

Yes, bidirectional testing can be performed on bell piles. Bidirectional static load tests (BDSLT) involve installing a load cell within the pile, which applies an upward and downward force simultaneously. This type of testing can accommodate the unique geometry of bell piles, allowing for accurate measurement of their load-bearing capacity and performance under different loading conditions. It is important to note, however, that the pile must have sufficient shaft resistance to counter the end bearing by providing reaction to the bidirectional cell. If this condition is not met, a reaction frame would be needed at the pile head to supplement the shaft resistance.

Yes, bidirectional testing (BDSLT) can replace traditional static load testing (SLT) on many types of piles. BDSLT offers several advantages, including the ability to test the pile’s capacity both in compression and tension using a single test setup. It can provide more detailed information about the pile’s performance and often requires less space and time compared to traditional SLT. However, the applicability may depend on specific project requirements and site conditions. One important condition is the availability of sufficient shaft resistance to provide equal reaction to the cell load in both upward and downward directions.

Yes, PDA testing can help determine the uplift capacity of piles. By analyzing the pile’s response to dynamic loading, PDA testing can estimate the full resistance distribution along the pile which allows the estimation of uplift resistance.

Bidirectional testing (BDSLT) offers several advantages over traditional static loading tests (SLT):

  • Efficiency: BDSLT can mobilize the bottom and top segments of the pile simultaneously with half the jacking force required to prove the required pile resistance.
  • Space: It requires less space on-site since the reaction system is built into the pile, eliminating the need for large reaction piles or anchors.
  • Detailed Data: Provides detailed information about the pile’s behavior under different loading conditions and reduces the influence of residual load on the test.
  • Cost-Effective: Can be more cost-effective due to the elimination of reaction frame setup.
  • Safety: Generally safer as it minimizes the need for extensive above-ground load-testing setups.

A: Thermal Integrity Profiling (TIP) and Cross-Hole Sonic Logging (CSL) are both methods used to evaluate the integrity of deep foundations, but they operate differently:

  • TIP: Uses the heat generated by curing concrete to detect anomalies. Sensors measure temperature variations along the pile, identifying potential defects like voids or inclusions based on deviations from expected temperature profiles. This test also allows to assess the concrete cover by detecting deviations of the reinforcing cage.
  • CSL: Involves passing ultrasonic pulses between pairs of access tubes installed in the pile. By analyzing the travel time and signal strength of these pulses, CSL can detect anomalies within the pile core defined by the positioning of the access pipes within the cage. This test does not report on concrete outside the core.

The PDCA (Pile Driving Contractors Association) certification for dynamic testing (PDA) is a professional certification that signifies proficiency in conducting and analyzing dynamic load tests using the Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA). This certification ensures that the individual has the necessary skills and knowledge to perform dynamic testing accurately and interpret the results effectively, which is critical for assessing pile capacity and integrity.

The Expander Body (EB) technology is an innovative method used to enhance the load-bearing capacity of piles and foundations. It involves the installation of an expandable device at the base of the pile, which is then inflated to create a larger base diameter, increasing the pile’s bearing capacity and reducing settlement. Yes, SACL has the expertise to design and implement Expander Body technology, leveraging its advanced engineering capabilities and experience in geotechnical solutions.

Dynamic (PDA) or static pile testing (SLT) should be performed ideally before finalizing the foundation design. This is the most effective way to confirm the design parameters and ensuring adequate foundations. Additional testing may be beneficial during the construction phase, after the piles have been installed but before the construction of the superstructure begins. This timing allows for the verification of pile capacity and integrity, ensuring that the foundation will perform as expected under the design loads.

Reach Out
For Expert Testing and Reliable Service

With over three decades at the forefront of the industry, SACL has built an unmatched reputation for innovation and reliability. Serving North America from our offices in Ottawa and Toronto, our expertise has earned the trust of clients across the continent and around the globe.

Whether you’re planning your next major project or have questions about our specialized services, our team is here to provide the support and solutions you need.

Contact us today to learn how we can help drive the success of your most critical projects.

Contact Us

Access Your Data

You are about to access data that is maintained on a site external to SACL systems. 

Please note that SACL is not responsible for the content, privacy policies, or practices of external sites. By proceeding, you acknowledge that the external site may have different cookie settings and data handling policies.